What is the Best Generative AI: ChatGPT vs Copilot vs Gemini vs Pi vs Claude 2

This is the age of artificial intelligence (AI). In the last few months, hundreds of AI models have flooded the internet, ranging from simple conversational chatbots to advanced coding companions. Among these, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google’s Gemini, Inflection’s Pi, and Anthropic’s Claude 2 have emerged as some of the top contenders in the generative AI space. Each model brings its own unique strengths and capabilities to the table, catering to different needs and preferences in the AI landscape. 

In this article, we will delve into the differences between ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google’s Gemini, Inflection’s Pi, and Anthropic’s Claude 2.

Mixtral 8x22B vs 8x7B vs Mistral 7B: Which one is better? Check Here!

The Major Differences

Here are the prominent differences between these generative AI models: 

• Coding, Math, and Data

For tasks requiring code help or solving intricate math issues, ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot perform well. They can provide code snippets, translate languages of programming, and deal with difficult mathematical equations. Google’s Gemini also gives good backing in these aspects but it might not deliver as much across the board when compared to the other two options.

Another field where some generative AIs show potential is data analysis. Although both ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google’s Gemini can handle data analysis tasks to some extent, they may not be the best choice for deep analysis. But for data summarization, both ChatGPT and Claude 2 do a good job.

• Summarizing Text and Custom Advice

All the generative AI tools in this list can assist you with summarizing lengthy texts or articles. But, Claude 2 is particularly good at providing summaries. For custom advice, both Pi and Claude 2 excel in conversational manners to give suggestions that fit your unique situation. Whereas, both Gemini and ChatGPT fall short of expectations in this aspect. 

• Data Visualization and Integration

Both ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot are good choices for tasks where you need to present data in formats such as tables or JSON. Also, the connection between these two tools is well-matched because Microsoft Copilot can be easily used with Microsoft 365 applications which can help in making work processes simpler.

• Real-time Information and Internet Access

ChatGPT (GPT-4) and Microsoft Copilot excel in quick use in present events or getting facts from the internet, are suggested. But, there is no online connection available with both Pi and Claude 2, which restricts them from reaching and handling real-time data.

• Image Generation

If you are looking for an AI that can create images with text, Microsoft Copilot is a good choice because it works together with DALL-E 2 which can generate images. GPT-4 also has an image generator that works well. However, other generative AIs mentioned here do not have image creation ability at present.

• Communication Style

ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google’s Gemini have a more formal communication style. Pi has a highly conversational tone that is less serious with its responses. However, you can set the conversation tone and style for all these AI models.

• AI Hallucinations and Accuracy

AI hallucinations refer to the AI producing incorrect information. In this age of AI, it is posing a serious problem. Fortunately, all generative AIs on this list have a low to moderate rate of AI hallucinations.

What is Genie? All About Google’s Latest AI Model Creating Playable Virtual World

ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot vs Google’s Gemini vs Inflection’s Pi vs Anthropic’s Claude 2: At a Glance

Capability	ChatGPT	Microsoft Copilot	Google Gemini	Inflection’s Pi	Anthropic Claude 2
Coding Help	Excellent	Excellent	Good	Limited	Good
Math Problems	Excellent	Excellent	Good	Limited	Good
Data Analysis	Good	Good	Good	Limited	Good
Summarizing Text	Good	Good	Good	Limited	Excellent
Custom Advice	Good	Good	Good	Excellent (Conversational)	Good
Data Presentation (Tables, JSON, etc.)	Excellent	Excellent	Good	Limited	Good
Internet Connectivity	No (GPT-4: Yes)	Yes	Yes	No	No
Real-time Current Affairs	No (GPT-4: Yes)	Yes	Yes	No	No
Image Generation	No (GPT-4: Yes)	Yes (via DALL-E 2)	No	No	No
File Handling (PDFs, etc.)	No (GPT-4: Yes)	Yes	Limited	Limited	Yes
Conversational Style	Formal	Formal	Formal	Highly Conversational	Formal
Response Limitations	None	30 per conversation	None	None	Limited in free version
AI Hallucinations Rate	Low	Low	Moderate	Moderate	Low
Integration with Office Apps	No	Yes (Microsoft 365)	No	No	No
Overall Improvement Since Last Review	Moderate	Good	Moderate	Moderate	High
Best Use Cases	Coding, Essays, Summaries	Office Tasks, Image Generation	Real-time Analysis, Google Apps	Life/Career Conversations	Data Summaries, Some Coding

Who is Will DePue, College Dropout, Who Helped Build OpenAI’s Sora?

Which is Better?

The most suitable generative AI for you is determined by the particular requirements you have. Here is a brief summary of perfect-use situations for each tool:

ChatGPT (with access to GPT-4): Coding, essays, summaries (with internet access)

Microsoft Copilot: Office tasks, image generation (via DALL-E 2 integration)

Google Gemini: Real-time analysis, Google Apps integration

Inflection Pi: Life/career conversations, casual interaction

Anthropic Claude 2: Data summaries, some coding, exceptional factual summaries

Each of these five AI models has its own strengths and weaknesses. Unfortunately, we cannot rule out the best of these five, since they each serve different purposes and excel in other areas. Ultimately, the final decision rests upon your shoulders.

Generative AI vs Predictive AI